Cloer v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
CATHERINE STONE, Justice.
Clifton Alan Cloer challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress, asserting that the written statement that he sought to have suppressed was obtained in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because the written statement was obtained in violation of Cloer’s Sixth Amendment rights. 1 Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Background
On September 20,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Upton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Kraft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rogers v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
- James Robert Hughes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
- Robert D. Hall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.