Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1993No. 69568PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. See Tex. Penal Code § 19.-03(a)(2). After finding appellant, William Alfred Robinson, guilty, the jury answered affirmatively the special issues required by Article 37.071(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and punishment was assessed at death. Direct review by this Court was then automatic. See Art. 37.-071(h). On original submission, we abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing regarding appellant’s claim under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API