Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided December 16, 2009No. 07-08-0514-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PATRICK A. PIRTLE, Justice.

The ability to obtain uncoerced confessions is not an evil but an unmitigated good. Justice Scalia, McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171, 181, 111 S.Ct. 2204, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991).

Appellant, Robert D. Hall, was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to deliver cocaine 1 weighing less than two hundred grams but at least four grams, a first degree felony 2 and was sentenced to confinement for forty years. In a single point of error, Appellant asserts the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when it admitted into evidence his…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pomier v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  3. Abraham Parra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  4. David Rivera v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2026
  5. Dominque Nashaun Parker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API