Bowie v. . Tucker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The clerk gave judgment by default and inquiry and the defendants made a motion before him to set aside the judgment on the ground of surprise and excusable neglect. The motion was denied, and upon appeal the clerk’s judgment -was reversed. C. S., 600. An applicant for relief under this section must show a meritorious defense, as well as excusable neglect. Dunn v. Jones, 195 N. C., 354; Crye v. Stoltz, 193 N. C., 802; Helderman v. Mills Co., 192 N. C., 626. Conceding that there is sufficient evidence of excusable neglect to support the finding to this effect, we have discovered no evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tise v. Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Dunn v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- American National Bank v. DewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Helderman v. Hartsell Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Sutherland v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Sutherland v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Carter v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.