Legal Opinion

Dunn v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

One phase of this controversy was disposed of by this Court in Dunn v. Jones, 192 N. C., 251. This case has been referred to as the rich young ruler case. The Court held that plaintiff’s title was defective in the particulars pointed out in the opinion. Thereafter on 22 June, 1927, plaintiff instituted the present action in ejectment for the possession of the land. The plaintiff excepts to the judgment rendered by the court upon the ground that the trial judge had no power to set aside the judgment by default final rendered by the clerk. This contention cannot be sustained. When the judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Aldridge v. Greensboro Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. McNair v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Helderman v. Hartsell Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Martin v. . VanlaninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Perkins v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API