Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Alexander

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 2000PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals, we must determine whether the trial court properly ordered two hospitals, as contingent beneficiaries under a will, to return funds distributed to them so that such funds can be redistributed to the primary beneficiaries under the will - citizens of the Republic of Georgia - who now claim, over 10 years after the initial distribution, that the executor did not notify them of the bequest. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with the instructions contained herein.

¶ 2 Attorney…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. Infertility Center of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kaiser v. Old Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Galli's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Solomon v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Three Keys Ltd. v. SR Utility Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Hall v. Episcopal Long Term CareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Drake Manufacturing Co. v. Polyflow, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Erfer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. First Republic Bank v. Brand, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API