Drake Manufacturing Co. v. Polyflow, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JENKINS, J.:
Polyflow, Inc. (“Polyflow”) appeals from a money judgment entered in favor of Drake Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“Drake”) in Drake’s action for breach of contract. Polyflow argues that the trial court erroneously denied Polyflow’s motion for judgment n.o.v., because at the time of trial, Drake lacked capacity to sue Poly-flow due to Drake’s failure to register in Pennsylvania as a foreign business corporation.
Polyflow timely raised Drake’s lack of capacity to sue as an affirmative defense to Drake’s action. At trial, Polyflow demonstrated that Drake failed to obtain a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Erie Indemnity Co. v. Coal Operators Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Youst v. Keck's Food Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- B.G. Balmer & Co. v. Frank Crystal & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Brown, J. v. Halpern, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Brittain v. Hope Enterprises Foundation Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.