Legal Opinion
Kersul v. Skulls Angels Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1985PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
This is a motion by defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The complaint in this action was served on or about April 4, 1985. At the time this motion was made, issue had not yet been joined.
The complaint alleges six causes of action and the facts as alleged therein are as follows: Plaintiff began her employment as office manager and bookkeeper with Skulls Angels Inc., in August 1975. In November 1979, defendant Mario P. Maggio, President of Communicar, Ltd., the successor corporation of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matherson v. MarchelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- James v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Drinkwater v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dortz v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Miller v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.