James v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. A board of education has an unfettered right to terminate the employment of a teacher during his probationary period, unless the teacher establishes that the board terminated for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of statutory proscription. We find nothing in this record to support any contention that the refusal here to renew appellant’s contract was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose and no assertion is made that this board transgressed any statutory proscription. Plaintiff cannot, by the device of an allegation that the sole reason for the…
2Cited by61 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- York v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ingle v. Glamore Motor Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.