Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1996No. 95-202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Jeffrey Rosenbaum (Rosen-baum) appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver on grounds the district court improperly admitted physical evidence.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Rosenbaum presents this issue:

The government’s introduction of suspected drugs into evidence in lieu of defense counsel’s objection to foundation of relevancy was reversible error.

The State rephrases the issue as:

Whether a sufficient “chain of custody” was presented to support the admission of methamphetamine seized from appellant?

FACTS

On September 26, 1994, Division of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Ostrowski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Taul v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. DeLuna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pool v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Regan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Mathew Judd Titmus v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API