Taul v. State

CARDINE, Justice.

Kerry Kent Taul was convicted by a jury of one count of aggravated robbery. Taul asserts that various errors occurred during his trial which mandate reversal of his conviction.

We affirm.

Appellant raises the following issues:

ISSUE I

Was the appellant’s constitutional right to due process violated by the admission of evidence concerning the identification of his photograph and the subsequent trial identification?

ISSUE II

Did the court err in permitting the prosecution to improperly impeach two defense witnesses thus denying the appellant his right to a fair trial?

ISSUE III

Does…