Legal Opinion

Costello v. Sims

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 15151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

In their brief defendants have presented and argued only two propositions, one involving an instruction given by the court and the other involving a requested instruction which was refused. These are assignments of error No. 15 and No. 11, respectively, and other assignments are expressly waived.

This was an action to foreclose a vendor’s lien on certain real property described in plaintiff’s petition. No money judgment was sought against,any of the record owners of the land. Judgment by default was entered against plaintiff’s debtor, who was a prior record owner, and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Seaver v. RulisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Prentice v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. JordenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API