Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1919No. 10051PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by Anna Freeman as administra-trix, against F. D. Prentice. From judgment for plaintiff the defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

On July 27, 1916, defendant in error, as plaintiff, filed in the superior court of Tulsa county, Oklahoma, her petition against plaintiff in error, alleging that Mahalia J. Mitchell died intestate December 18th, 1915, seized of an equity in and to lot 7, block 81, of Joe Kostachek's resubdivision of block 81, original townsite of Tulsa, Okla-Mioma; that said Mahalia J. Mitchell in her lifetime contracted with Joe Kostachek for the purchase of said lot for three hundred and twenty-five dollars, on which she paid all except about $86; that on September 8th, 1915, deceased borrowed from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Overstreet and Rock Island Impln't v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Renas v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Bale v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Gragg v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Hunter v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API