Legal Opinion
American Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. Jorden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1926No. 16450PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
WILLIAM'S, C.
A coal company owned and operated certain coal mining properties in the vicinity of McCurtain county, Okla. Some Ohio people held first liens against the property, 'and apparently acquired the same by sale on foreclosure proceedings. The Ohio people entered into a sale of. the property to D. J. Jorden, subject to the indebtedness then held against the property. D. J. Jorden came to Oklahoma, took charge of the property, and commenced its operations. Jorden carried the coal company’s account with the American National Bank of Oklahoma City, which advanced credit to .the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Young v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Smith v. ColsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- First State Bank of Indiahoma v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Scott v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Western Silo Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- First Nat. Bank of Ada v. ElamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Walker v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.