Legal Opinion

Kentucky Bank & Trust Co. v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 1914No. 3418PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Action by the Kentucky Bank & Trust Company and another against W. H. Pritchett and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

On August 12, 1908, T. W. Pritchett, W. H. Pritchett, and C. W. Pritchett executed and delivered to the Kentucky Bank Trust Company three promissory notes of $1,835 each, and on said date W. H. Pritchett was the owner of lot 7 in block 42, in Sayer's subdivision of lots 10 to 14 in block 42 in the city of Chickasha, Okla., and the money received by Pritchett on said notes was used in paying the purchase price of said lots and for the purpose of constructing a brick building thereon. On the 15th day of May, 1909, W. H. Pritchett and Martha Pritchett, his wife, conveyed an undivided half…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. TredwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Bamberger v. SchoolfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Gus. Lewy & Co. v. FischlTexas Supreme Court · 1886

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Success Realty Co. v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Renas v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Parker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API