Legal Opinion
County of Scott v. Johnston
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 30, 2013No. A13-0535PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellants, landowners who are entitled to an award of attorney fees and other related expenses in the underlying eminent-domain proceeding, challenge the district court’s reduction of requested attorney and appraisal fees, arguing that, as a matter of law, the district court is preclud*359ed from considering the amount involved and results obtained in its determination of the reasonableness of the requested fees. Appellants also argue that the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous.
FACTS
Respondent County of Scott (the county) offered appellants Terry D.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Head v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- City of Devils Lake v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Carlson v. Sala Architects, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe Affiliates 1-20, and Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, and Third Party v. Berwald Roofing Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Debra Jean Johnson, a/k/a Debra J. Johnson, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Company, Below.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014