Legal Opinion
United States v. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Goodman Manufacturing Company, Lee-Norse Company and Galis Electric and MacHine Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 29, 1963No. 14405_1PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
On March 6, 1963, in a suit filed by the United States against the defendants based on Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18, the court below entered an interlocutory injunction to prevent the defendants from carrying out agreements contemplating corporate acquisitions by Ingersoll-Rand of companies engaged in manufacturing underground coal mining machinery in the United States. The basis for the issuance of the interlocutory injunction was “that the effect of the proposed acquisitions may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly.” 1…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Oburn v. ShappCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Tidewater Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fisons Limited and Fisons Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. United States of America, Respondent-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.