Legal Opinion
Fixico v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1937No. 26617PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
The relative positions of the parties here are reverse to that occupied in ,the trial court, and they will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the court below.
The suit is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of a collision of the defendant’s automobile with one driven and occupied by persons not involved in this suit. Plaintiff was a passenger in defendant’s automobile at the time of the collision. The cause was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict' and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $7,861, and defendant has appealed.
It is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. GriggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Beatrice Creamery Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Lakeview, Inc. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lee v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Smith v. GizziSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- M & P Stores, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Wray v. FerrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.