Legal Opinion

Hayashi v. Scott Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2000No. 21877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

This appeal arises from the decision and order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIRAB) denying appellants Scott Company (Scott) and Argonaut Insurance Company’s (Argonaut) motion for reconsideration, dated August 11, 1998. At issue is whether the LIRAB properly determined when the statute of limitations for a workers’ compensation claim begins to run for non-latent injuries under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-82 (1993). 1 Specifically, the question is whether, as Scott and Argonaut argue, appellee Kenneth Hayashi’s (Hayashi)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Yamaguchi v. Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Claim of Bragg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Flor v. HolguinHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Rogan v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API