Legal Opinion

Claim of Bragg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1996No. 17937PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

In this insurance case, stemming from a collision between an automobile and a motorcycle, claimant-appellant/appellant Laural Bragg appeals the First Circuit Court’s affir-mance of respondent-appellee/appellee insurance commissioner Wayne C. Metcalfs (the commissioner) final order. The commissioner, ruling in favor of respondent-appellee/ap-pellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (State Farm), held that, pursuant to Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) chapters 431:10C and 431:10G, Bragg was not entitled to collect no-fault benefits from an automobile insurance policy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sato v. TawataHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. University of Hawai'i Professional Assembly v. TomasuHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Smith v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Morgan v. Planning Department, County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Citizens Against Reckless Development v. Zoning Board of AppealsHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Korsak v. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API