Legal Opinion

Greer v. Heyer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1927No. 1 Div. 429PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldust, J.

The appeal is from a judgment granting a new trial upon motion of plaintiff.

Thé sole question presented in argument is whether the court had lost control over the original judgment and it had become final for failure to keep alive the motion for new trial by proper orders of continuance, under Code, § 6670.

The motion for new trial, filed within 30 days, was regularly continued by consent of the parties until March 20, 1926. No order of continuance was made on or prior to that date, further extending the time for hearing the motion. The new trial was granted on May 5, 1926. Without more, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Ex Parte MargartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Childers v. Samoset Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Rudolph v. RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. T. R. Miller Mill Co. v. RallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API