Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Adams

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1927No. 6 Div. 896PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding directed to Hon. Richard V. Evans of the Tenth judicial circuit, seeking to correct an order pertaining to a motion for a new trial. The case made by the petition is briefly this:

Petitioner, as plaintiff, recovered a judgment on October 21, 1926, against Alabama Lime & Stone Corporation. Within 30 days the defendant moved for a new trial. This motion was continued by regular orders until January 8, 1927. Thereafter the following memorandum "orders were entered:

“Jan. 8/27. Passed to Jan. 15/27. Evans, J.
“Jan. 15/27. Passed to Jan. 22/27. Evans, J.
“Jan. 22/27.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte DoakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Ex Parte SchoelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Greer v. HeyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Ex Parte MargartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Guaranty Pest Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Lee v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API