Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Shaynin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ OF Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. BeeteER, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This is a quasi criminal proceeding brought against defendant in error for violation of an ordinance of the city of Chicago passed February 19, 1912, prohibiting the conducting or operating of any exhibition commonly known as a museum of anatomy. Jury was waived and the cause was submitted to the court. After hearing, the court held the ordinance invalid and discharged defendant in error. Thereupon the trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance was involved, and that in his opinion the public interest required that the case should be .brought directly to this court.

Sectio…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Block v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. People v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. North Chicago City Railway Co. v. Town of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Laugel v. City of BushnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Harmison v. City of LewistownIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Nokomis v. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  5. Village of Bensenville v. Botu, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API