Legal Opinion

Laugel v. City of Bushnell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1902PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of McDonough county; the Hon. John A. Gray, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The Appellate Court for the Third District affirmed the judgment of the circuit court of McDonough county adjudging the plaintiff in error to be guilty of maintaining a nuisance, in violation of an ordinance of the city of Bushnell, and sentencing him to pay a fine in accordance with the provisions of the ordinance. This writ of error challenges the correctness of the conclusion reached by the Appellate Court.

The ordinance said to have been violated is as follows: “Be it ordained by the city council of the city of Bushnell:

“Section 1. That any place in said city of Bushnell where hop ale, hop…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Chicago City Railway Co. v. Town of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Village of Des Plaines v. PoyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Harmison v. City of LewistownIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Emmons v. City of LewistownIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hewitt v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Virginia State EntomologistSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  2. People v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. City of Nokomis v. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API