Legal Opinion

Block v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1909PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Writ op Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Earlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cartwright

The plaintiffs in error, Jake Block, Nathan Wolf, J. H. Ferris, B. Munstock, S. VanRonkel and A. VonRonkel, filed their bill of complaint in the superior court of Cook county against the defendant in error, city of Chicago, alleging that they were engaged in the business of operating five and ten-cent theaters in the city of Chicago, where moving pictures were displayed, and praying the court to enjoin the defendant in error from enforcing an ordinance entitled “An ordinance prohibiting the exhibition of obscene and immoral pictures and regulating the exhibition of pictures of the classes and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arms v. AyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People ex rel. Morrison v. CregierIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gundling v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Miller v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. McDougall v. LuederIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People Ex Rel. Doscher v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Welton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API