Legal Opinion

Village of Bensenville v. Botu, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 28, 1976No. 75-95PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

The defendants, the Botu Corporation and its agents and employees (hereinafter Botu), were permanently enjoined from operating a purported health club within the village. Botu contends that the amended complaint and the proofs were insufficient to sustain the injunction.

After a temporary injunction was issued, a hearing was held upon stipulated facts and the permanent injunction order was then entered. The stipulated facts were, essentially, that on January 8,1975, defendant began operation under a license granted to it by the plaintiff to operate a health club. In fact, the activities which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toushin v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. City of Chicago v. GeraciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. People ex rel. Dyer v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Sings v. City of JolietIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  5. City of Chicago v. ShayninIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gilmore v. Stanmar, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API