Village of Bensenville v. Botu, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
The defendants, the Botu Corporation and its agents and employees (hereinafter Botu), were permanently enjoined from operating a purported health club within the village. Botu contends that the amended complaint and the proofs were insufficient to sustain the injunction.
After a temporary injunction was issued, a hearing was held upon stipulated facts and the permanent injunction order was then entered. The stipulated facts were, essentially, that on January 8,1975, defendant began operation under a license granted to it by the plaintiff to operate a health club. In fact, the activities which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Toushin v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- City of Chicago v. GeraciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People ex rel. Dyer v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Sings v. City of JolietIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Chicago v. ShayninIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Gilmore v. Stanmar, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Difanis v. FutiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.