Legal Opinion

State v. White

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 23, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-395PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

In this criminal appeal, we consider the question of whether the imposition of consecutive sentences on four of the five separately charged offenses for which appellant was convicted violates either the state or federal double jeopardy clauses or the Arizona double punishment statute, A.R.S. § 13-116. We conclude that there is no constitutional or statutory violation, and that the trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences. Appellant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Appellant was involved in an accident in which four teenagers walking alongside the road…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  5. State v. HerreraArizona Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Rodriguez-GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API