Legal Opinion

State v. Gunter

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1982No. 1 CA-CR 5096-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The major issue in this review of a post-conviction proceeding is whether a defendant’s single act which subjects him to multiple criminal charges violates the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Arizona Constitutions as well as the double punishment statute of Arizona.

This action arises from the summary denial by the trial court of defendant Rexford Howard Gunter’s petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32.1, Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The defendant was originally charged with having committed two counts of assault with a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ladner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. MaderaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HenleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API