Hoke v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing his action for rescission of a contract for sale to him of a second mortgage.
No error having been assigned to the trial court’s findings of fact, such, perforce, became the established facts of the case. Fain v. Nelson, 57 Wn. (2d) 217, 356 P. (2d) 302. Our review is, therefore, limited to whether or not the facts as found support the trial court’s conclusions of law and judgment. J. D. English Steel Co. v. Tacoma School Dist. No. 10, 57 Wn. (2d) 502, 358 P. (2d) 319.
The essential findings of the trial court are:
Supplemental Finding of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Lawson v. HelmichWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Fain v. NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Hallin v. BodeWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Wickre v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ferree v. Doric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Blinzler v. AndrewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
- Andrew v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Underwood v. SternerWashington Supreme Court · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.