Archibald Estate v. Matteson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff corporation brought this action to obtain judgment from the defendant for the sum of $1,050, alleged to have been loaned by the former to the latter. When plaintiff rested its case, the court, upon the application of defendant, granted a nonsuit, and it is from this judgment of nonsuit, upon a bill of exceptions, that this appeal is taken.
This cause has previously been before this court on an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, and the judgment reversed. (Archibald Estate v. Matteson (Cal.), 84 Pac. 840.) The reversal was based upon the proposition, according to the opinion filed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Wassermann v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wright v. RoseberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stills v. GrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lasry v. LedermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.