Legal Opinion

Nielson v. Newmyer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 8, 1951No. 16251PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Since there is no dispute as to their several interests, we shall refer to those of Mildred B. Newmyer, Frank Newmyer and Greta Newmyer by the name of Frank; to those of Alfred E. Newmyer and Pauline Newmyer by the name of Alfred, and those of L. Moyle Nielson and Gladys Nielson by the name of Nielson. We shall refer to the Rio Grande Canal Water Users Association as the Water Users Association.

Alfred brought this action to require the Water Users Association to deliver to him twenty-five inches of water from the Rio Grande Canal. The Water Users Association, by answer, suggested the need of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Lower Latham Ditch Co. v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Davis v. RandallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bayou Land Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District v. Twin Lakes Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Adaven Management, Inc. v. Mountain Falls Acquisition Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Janitell Farms, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Matter of Estate of PalizziSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API