Legal Opinion

Adaven Management, Inc. v. Mountain Falls Acquisition Corp.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2008No. 48429PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether water rights may be transferred separately from the property to which they are appurtenant without prior severance under NRS 533.040. We also consider whether the anti-speculation doctrine adopted by this court in Bacher v. State Engineer 2 limits the ability to acquire a security or ownership interest in a water right separately from the land to which the right is appurtenant. Because NRS 533.040 and the anti-speculation doctrine focus on maintaining water’s beneficial use, not its ownership, we conclude that such transfers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Bayou Land Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Tai-Si Kim v. KearneyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2012
  3. Howell v. RicciNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Sierra Pac. Indus. v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. DIAMOND NAT. RES. PROT. AND CONSERVATION ASS'N v. DIAMOND VALLEY RANCH, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API