Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. . Dellinger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The assignments of error are so restricted as to preclude us from the consideration of most of the points made by defendant's counsel in his clear and well-considered argument. The defendant (493) does assign as error, however the refusal of the court to instruct the jury that in any aspect of the testimony the plaintiff has failed to show even prima facie evidence of title in himself when the action was brought, and that they should therefore respond to the issue in the negative.

A deed is presumed to have been delivered at the time it bears date unless the contrary is satisfactorily shown.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Helms v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Coates Bros. v. . WilkesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Sandlin v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Belk Ex Rel. Belk v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. State v. . YellowdaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API