Legal Opinion

Sandlin v. Weaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1954No. 162PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobbitt, J.

Plaintiffs contend that the two instruments, the deed and the contract, bearing date of 28 May, 1923, were executed at the same time. Defendants contend otherwise. “The date recited in a deed or other writing is at least prima facie evidence that the instrument was executed and delivered on such date.” Stansbury on Evidence, sec. 229; Turlington v. Neighbors, 222 N.C. 694, 24 S.E. 2d 648; Fortune v. Hunt, 149 N.C. 358, 63 S.E. 82; Kendrick v. Dellinger, 117 N.C. 491, 23 S.E. 438.

On motion for judgment of nonsuit, we consider and construe the two instruments together as parts of one…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Fortune v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Bend v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Lamb v. . LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Laster v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Normile v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API