Legal Opinion

Keck v. Vandyke

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1928No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Defendant appeals from a decree in equity requiring him to convey to plaintiffs the legal title to a property, standing in his name, but as to which it was decided that a resulting trust existed in their favor. Both in his statement of the questions involved (which limits the scope of the appeal: Furman v. Broscious, 268 Pa. 119; Slemba v. Hamilton & Sons, 290 Pa. 267), and in his brief of argument, appellant presents four points for our consideration, three of which are unimportant in view of the facts not disputed on this appeal, and the fourth is: Does sec. 6…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. BarberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Slemba v. Hamilton & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. McLaughlin v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Clark v. TrindleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  5. White v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. West, Admrx. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Rooney v. MacZkoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API