Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1930No. Appeal, 304PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The City of Philadelphia, by proper action, opened Ludlow Street between 20th and 21st Streets. Appellant, the Philadelphia Electric Company, claiming to own the land included in the bed of the street, had viewers appointed to assess damages against the city. On an appeal from an award in its favor, the court below entered judgment for the city on the verdict of a jury. This appeal follows.

From the record before us, two situations may exist which will prevent appellant’s recovery. First, if it is shown that the plaintiff has no title to the property condemned;…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Quicksall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Milford Borough v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Kniss v. Borough of DuquesneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Keck v. VandykeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Yeakle v. NaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Plauchak v. BolingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Koerth v. Turtle Creek BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API