Legal Opinion

Wright v. Barber

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1921No. Appeal, No. 363PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal, No. 363, Jan. T., 1921, by Michael Barber, from decree of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Noy. T., 1919, No. 134, on bill in equity, in case of Minnie M. Wright and Ira H, Spencer v. Borough of Susquehanna Depot, M. J. Lannon et al., councilmen, and Michael Barber. Bill in equity by taxpayers of the borough of Susquehanna Depot for an injunction to restrain payment of money to Michael Barber on a paying contract.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 363, Jan. T., 1921, by Michael Barber, from decree of C. P. Susquehanna Co., Noy. T., 1919, No. 134, on bill in equity, in case of Minnie M. Wright and Ira H, Spencer v. Borough of Susquehanna Depot, M. J. Lannon et al., councilmen, and Michael Barber. Bill in equity by taxpayers of the borough of Susquehanna Depot for an injunction to restrain payment of money to Michael Barber on a paying contract. Before Smith, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered a decree in accordance with the prayer of the bill. Defendant, Michael Barber, appealed.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plain iffs, who owned properties fronting on West Main Street in the borough of Susquehanna Depot and *188were taxpayers therein, filed a bill in equity against the borough, certain of the municipal officers, and Michael Barber, the appellant, averring the latter had a contract with the borough authorizing him to pave, curb and gutter West Main Street and Willow Avenue; that the work had been partly performed and was being completed in a manner substantially different from that provided in the contracts, plans and specifications, to the great loss of the borough;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. BogertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. New York & Pennsylvania Co. v. New York Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Fleming v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Scaife v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API