Legal Opinion

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 25, 2014No. 30545-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, A.C.J.

¶[1 Charles Rose sued his former employer, Anderson Hay and Grain Company (AHG), in Kittitas County Superior Court for his alleged wrongful discharge in violation of public policy after a similar suit was dismissed in federal court because he had failed to timely exhaust his federal administrative remedies. The state court dismissed his action, reasoning his federal administrative remedies would have been adequate to vindicate the public policy had he timely filed his administrative complaint. Mr. Rose appealed and this court affirmed. Our Supreme Court remanded the matter back…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Community Care Center of Aberdeen v. Mary BarrentineMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API