Legal Opinion

Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2015No. 90975-0Published

1Opinion of the Court

F-1--t:E· . / IN CLERKI OPFICI ~ ...... COURI',I'I'IaiOI . . .-nxl I DATE SEP 1 7 20151 h?q~91 Ronald . nt *upreme Court Ctertr IN TII:F~ SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CI--IAPJ__,ES ROSE, ) ) No. 90975-0 Petitioner, ) ) V. ) EnBanc ) ANDERSON HAY AND GRAIN ) COt\1PANY, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Filed SEP 1 7 20i5 ·-~-·--~---~------- JdHNSON, J.-This case involves the jeopardy element of the tort for wrongful discharge against public policy and whether the administrative remedies available under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), 1 49 U.S.C. § 31105, preclude…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API