Legal Opinion
Robert L. Solze and Lois M. Dimitre v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided May 3, 2013No. 12-1512PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On May 8, 2012, the petitioners, through counsel, filed a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus, asserting that VA would not “pay Mr. Sol-ze’s awarded VA benefits to him or his valid attorney-in-fact or identify the legal authorization to not do so.” Petition at 1. In a January 4, 2013, order, the Court denied the petition. Solze v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 118 (2013). Although the panel expressed “concern over VA’s reluctance to utilize other methods by which it is authorized to distribute benefits,” including temporary payments under 38 C.F.R. § 13.63, the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of License Comm'rs of Tiverton v. PastoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mansourian v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Bond v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Leroy S. Robinson, Jr. v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
- Catherine Cornell v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
- Alvin Demery v. R Obert L. W IlkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
- Catherine Cornell v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
- Joe A. Browder, Jr. v. David J. ShulkinUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.