Legal Opinion

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2010No. 08-16330PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 8, 2010, is hereby amended. The amended opinion is attached hereto. With this amendment, Judges Schroeder and Berzon have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Shadur so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. No future petitions for rehearing will be entertained.

OP…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. HENRY A. v. WilldenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. McCollum v. California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Herrera v. City of EspanolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Sofie Karasek v. University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API