Bond v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Per curiam
The parties to this appeal have jointly moved for an order approving disposition of this appeal in accordance with their Stipulated Agreement. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) and the appellant jointly represent that they “have resolved, to their mutual satisfaction, the issue raised by this appeal ... and that this agreement disposes of the entire appeal.” Joint Motion at 1.
This Court’s jurisdiction is confined to the review of final Board of. Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decisions which are adverse to a claimant. 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a); 7266(a) (formerly §§ 4052(a); 4066(a)). The BVA…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
3Cited by48 opinions
- Cullens v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Mark W. Breeden v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
- Thayer v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- William A. Forcier v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Williams v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.