Legal Opinion
Borman v. Tschida
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1969No. 8545PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Judge.
The basic issue in this case is whether Highway Patrolman Gerald Olson, in arresting Mr. Paul Borman on September 28, 1968, had reasonable grounds to believe that Mr. Borman had been driving a motor vehicle upon the public highway while he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor.
Under the provisions of N.D.C.C. § 39-20-01, the Implied Consent Law, any person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent, subject to the provisions of ch. 39-20, to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath, saliva, or urine…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. BufalinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. BonannoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Salter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Agnew v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. VandeHovenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.