Legal Opinion

State v. VandeHoven

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1986No. Crim. 1152, 1153PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Charles VandeHoven appealed from an order by the County Court of Foster County denying suppression of a blood sample and the judgments of conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol and for possession of alcoholic beverage by a person under the age of twenty-one. We affirm.

On the evening of January 25,1985, Van-deHoven, who was nineteen years old at that time, was traveling northbound on a paved county road which did not have a center line. Officers Grosgebauer and Schulz, members of the North Dakota State Highway Patrol, were traveling southbound on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Moser v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Wibben v. North Dakota State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Salter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API