Legal Opinion
Packard v. Continental Airlines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 2001No. 01-4013PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Stephen S. Packard appeals from the district court’s order dismissing, as time barred, this action brought pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654. We agree with the district court that this action is barred by the statute of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Belinda MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NANNIE AND THE NEWBORNS, INC.; Business Solutions, Inc.; Larry D. Gudgel, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Blankenship v. Buchanan General Hospital, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hillstrom v. Best Western TLC HotelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Rowley v. Brigham Young Univ.District Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Barrett v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2013
- Packard v. Continental Airlines, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 2002