Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Illinois Department of Corrections

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 2013No. Case No. 12-CV-2024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, District Judge.

This case is about a claim that the Illinois Department of Corrections interfered with an employee’s rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act. The Department of Corrections has an attendance policy of progressive discipline, wherein an employee is given increasingly strong penalties for being absent from work without approval or authorization. The policy also included a reset switch that forgave all prior unauthorized absences if an employee had no unauthorized absences in a two-year period.

Over the span of seven years, Plaintiff accumulated…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cindy Barrett v. Illinois Department of CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Woida v. Genesys Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  3. Pillow v. McDonoughDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API