Legal Opinion
Town of Brookfield v. Greenridge, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 15, 1979PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This ease arises out of the failure of the defendant Greenridge, Inc., to complete certain road and drainage improvements on approved subdivision plats in accordance with town specifications. The plaintiff town of Brookfield sought damages against Greenridge, in the first count of a two-count complaint, for its failure to complete the improvements. The second count was against Green-ridge as principal and Travelers Insurance Company as surety on a performance bond posted by both defendants in connection with the subdivision approval. The court found the issues for the plaintiff on both counts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Gordon v. Indusco Management Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Greenwich Contracting Co. v. Bonwit Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Herbert S. Newman & Partners, P.C. v. CFC Construction Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Dooley v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Hamann v. Town of NewtownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- North Haven Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.