Legal Opinion
Hamann v. Town of Newtown
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 31, 1988No. 5878PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal by the trial court of their appeal from a decision of the defendant board of selectmen of the town of Newtown (board).1 We find no error.
The plaintiffs are the owners of a sixteen acre parcel of land in Newtown which is crossed by a road known as Kale Davis. Pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-39,2 the plaintiffs applied to the board for a deter*523mination of the boundaries of Kale Davis road, which boundaries the plaintiffs alleged had become lost or uncertain. Following a hearing, the board issued a resolution which established the boundaries to be as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zoning Board of Appeals v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- A & H Corp. v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Goldfeld v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Hartford Trust Co. v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Thompson v. Town of PortlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Montanaro v. Aspetuck Land Trust, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Marchesi v. BOARD OF SELECTMEN OF LYMEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Marchesi v. Bd. of Selectmen of the Town of LymeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- North Haven Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Cybulski v. P. Z. Comm. of Enfield, No. Cv-93-0526425-S (Feb. 22, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.