Samuel Edwards Associates v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.
In this proceeding, petitioners, who are consumers of irrigation water in Ventura County, seek annulment of certain orders of the respondent Railroad Commission declaring that Piru Water Company, a defunct corporation, and the individual respondents are conducting and operating a public utility, and fixing the rates to be charged for water supplied to consumers for irrigation purposes.
From the return of the Railroad Commission, filed in response to the writ issued herein, it appears that on May 24, 1923, the Piru Water Company and the individual respondents herein filed with the Railroad…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Palermo L. W. Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Sherlock v. GreavesMontana Supreme Court · 1938
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Western Canal Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.