Legal Opinion
Waltman v. Fahnestock & Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 11, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-2143PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), defendant, Fahnestock & Co., Inc., filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. Having considered the parties’ briefs, I will grant Fahnestock’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
This motion is the latest episode in a long running drama. The story began when Fahnestock discharged Joseph Waltman in December, 1988. Before that time, Mr. Waltman worked for the firm in two capacities. He was the head of Fahnestock’s retirement division, and he also ran a general insurance agency in Pennsylvania as a sub-licensee for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In the Matter of the New York Stock Exchange Arbitration Between, Fahnestock & Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Joseph J. Waltman, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Rhoads v. HeberlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brennan v. National Telephone Directory Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Estate of Labrum & Doak v. Bechtle (In Re Labrum & Doak, LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Jefferies v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bishop v. GNC FRANCHISING LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.